Part of the ProCESS

A BLOG BY DR olusegun olusanya () FOR OXICM
The following article contains minor spoilers for the Star Wars franchise

EPISODE IV: A NEW HOPE

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away

The late 1990s seem like a dark time for critically ill patients with sepsis. 28 day mortality approached 50%, with demonstrable delays in time to receive critical interventions such as antibiotics and fluids. Despite increased awareness, new definitions to help, and cool devices and ideas to maximise- and even supramaximise- oxygen delivery, mortality had not changed from severe sepsis and septic shock in nearly 40 years.

Enter Emmanuel Rivers, MD and Early Goal Directed Therapy.

You refer to the prophecy of the one who will bring balance to the force.
You believe it is this…

His team, from Detroit, Michigan, postulated that treating these severely ill patients early and aggressively, aiming to maximize certain resuscitation end points (CVP, MAP, urine output, central venous oxygen saturation, and haematocrit) within 6 hours with continuous monitoring and liberal use of fluids, blood, and vasopressors to achieve the targets.

The results were astounding- a reduction in in-hospital mortality from 46.5% to 30%. (15% ARR reduction, NNT 6). Published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2001, this landmark paper transformed sepsis care around the world. So much so, that the 2008 Surviving Sepsis guidelines used the Detroit protocol essentially verbatim.

However, dark times were to come. Critics pointed out the rapid adoption of a single-centre unblended RCT with significants risk of bias. Undisclosed conflicts of interest were discovered. And, despite multiple attempts, no one was able to replicate the impressive results of Rivers’ trial (except for this one study from China).

Begun, the clone wars now has

The ProCESS study is the latest published attempt to verify the effects of EGDT. Conducted across 31 hospitals in the USA between 2007 and 2013, 1351 patients were enrolled in a 3 arm trial comparing EGDT as per Rivers’ protocol, a “protocolised” arm using less aggressive targets, and a “usual care arm”.

Mortality rates at 90 days were 21% EGDT, 18% “protocolised” and 19% “usual care”. The difference was not found to be statistically significant.

YOU WERE THE CHOSEN ONE!

Looking in closer at the trial, it’s difficult to see any major flaws. There was tight adherence to the protocols in all groups. The patients were similar to the ones in Detroit (APACHE scores etc).

It could be argued that there wasn’t enough difference between the groups. Each of them were resuscitated to some targets within 6 hours and had early antibiotics (indeed- fluid balance was quite similar between groups at 6 hours and 72 hours, except blood and inotropes which were higher in the Rivers group). It could also be argued that there was a “Hawthorne effect” of being in the trial, and that it may be underpowered to detect small mortality benefits.

The trial also shows some amazing stuff- the mortality from severe sepsis has been reduced in these American units by nearly 25% in the last 13 years. They’re doing similarly well down under, too.

No, I am your father…search your feelings, you know this to be true…
NOOOOOOOOO!!

It would seem that despite the controversy, EGDT ended up improving sepsis care throughout the USA by promoting early recognition and aggressive treatment. Dr Rivers did bring balance to the Force after all- perhaps not the way he initially intended.

There is still good in him…I can feel it.

So what does this mean for us ICM trainees in the UK? Based on fairly recent data, our severe sepsis mortality is hovering around 30% (as is most of Europe)… it would seem that there is room for improvement.

Use the Force, Luke…

I see a number of things we can do:

  1.       Help to answer the question locally. The UK Protocolised management in Sepsis (ProMISE) trial is currently recruiting, and is our own version of ProCESS. Help recruit and spread the word! (If you’re down under, the ARISE study is your local equivalent)
  2.       Improve local sepsis care. Give early antibiotics and fluids (use the sepsis six if you’re not already). Help out with audit and research- ask your local ED and ICU consultants how you can help.
  3.       Join the larger conversation. Read the paper, the editorial, and the excellent online commentaries (Like this one http://academiclifeinem.com/process-study-identify-sepsis-early-treat-aggressively/) . Discuss it at your local journal club. Get online and blog about it. Join Twitter and Google + and continue debating how we can further improve sepsis care. Listen to podcasts- Scott Weingart of emcrit.org has interviewed Derek Angus  (one of the key players in the study) -listen to it here http://emcrit.org/podcasts/process-trial/

Should we change practice based on this paper? I think that’s more for your local teams to decide. It would certainly seem that oximetric CVCs and optimising haematocrit doesn’t offer much over simpler targets (lactate clearance and MAP).

I suspect that many teams would like to see the results of ProMISE before making any big decisions. Interestingly, the plan is to combine the results of ProCESS, ARISE and ProMISE into a “supertrial” and do lots of clever analysis. The saga of EGDT is far from over…

You’re all clear kid! Now let’s blow this thing and go home!

REFERENCES

  1.       Friedman G, Silva E, Vincent JL. Has the mortality of septic shock changed with time. Crit Care Med 1998 Dec; 26(12): 2078-86  (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9875924 )
  2.       Rivers E, Nguyen B, et al. Early Goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. NEJM 2001 Nov 8; 345(19): 1386-77  (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11794169)
  3.       Dellinger RP et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008 Jan; 36(1): 296-327 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18158437 )
  4.       Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group of Zheijang Province. The effect of early goal directed therapy on treatment of critical patients with severe sepsis/septic shock: A multi-center prospective randomized control study. Zhonggue Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2010 Jun; 22(6): 331-4  (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20594464 )- article in Chinese
  5.       The ProCESS investigators. A randomised trial of protocol-based care for Early Septic Shock. NEJM 2014 Mar 18. (Epub ahead of print) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24635773 )
  6.       Kaukonen KM et al. Mortality related to severe sepsis and Septic Shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA 2014 March 18 (online first). (https://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1850096 )

USEFUL TWITTER LINKS

@theARISEstudy (twitter feed of Anthony Delaney, key investigator. He’s also a fountain of EGDT knowledge and will answer lots of questions related to ProCESS, ProMISE and ARISE!)

FURTHER LISTENING

Great podcast from 2012 by Anthony Holley on goal-directed therapy here http://intensivecarenetwork.com/index.php/icn-activities/icn-podcasts/247-goal-directed-therapy-by-anthony-holley-with-presentation

star-wars-stormtroopers-hospital_0Segun is an anaesthetic and ICU registrar in the Oxford deanery, Coeditor of JICScast, prolific twitterer and firm believer in / contributor to #FOAMed
Advertisements

How to pass the FFICM

A Blog by Dr MJ Slabbert ()for OXICM
no mean feet
Passing the FFICM: no mean feet
The only source of knowledge is experience. – Albert Einstein

…. well, lets just say – Einstein didn’t have a smartphone, Wi-Fi or the internet.

Being an “old school” trainee, I am a BIG supporter of this statement by Einstein. There truly is no substitute for experience.  Good and bad experiences – you can learn something from each type.  However we now live in an “IT” era where information is available at your fingertips.  Mobile technology has brought libraries, journals, studies, research, training videos, discussions and blogs with ease to the ward round.  This has changed the way we acquire knowledge, learn, change practice, share information, debate and prepare for exams.

Preparing for a different fellowship exam a few years ago I had 21 textbooks scattered all over my bedroom floor.  Then last year for the FFICM I had my laptop and the internet – with only a hand full of textbooks in sight.

So, for this, my first blog, I thought I’d share some strategies as well as online and electronic sources of “knowledge” and blogs that I found useful when I prepared for my FFICM exam a year ago – which I passed by the way!

In time, we are hoping to add the Oxford Deanery Intensive Care Medicine blog to this list of invaluable online resources.

Here goes…

Experience

It is still holds true that nothing beats experience.  I relied heavily on the experience I gained working in an excellent Intensive Care Unit to pass my exam.  My logic was that if they taught me the correct things and gave me the opportunity to gain the appropriate amount of experience, then supplementing this with a bit of reading should help me easily pass the exam.  And it did.  It is super important to get experience in a unit where there is a culture of teaching, learning, questioning, training and researching.  Seek out these opportunities.  Think big!  There are opportunities to do interdeanery secondments or go oversees and get a breath of experience and work with some incredible teachers.  This is the best way to acquire knowledge; at the coal face.

Printed resources

Ah, there are few things as comforting as a good book – even if it is a textbook.

There are numerous books covering the aspects of the FICM curriculum.  To date, as far as I am aware there is no one comprehensive textbook purely for this exam.  I used a few textbooks in my exam preparation.  These complemented each other.  A few of them are mentioned here and are available to purchase (google them).  The list below is not comprehensive and I have no conflict of interests to declare.

Textbook: MCQ

Multiple Choice Questions in Intensive Care Medicine Steve Benington, Peter Nightingale, Maire Shelly

– Written for the EDIC part 1 exam, but useful in MCQ practice for the FFICM

FRCA: MCQs for the Final FRCA: Saunders Self Assessment Series, 1e (FRCA Study Guides) Karen Henderson

-Strictly not an ICM textbook, but has lots of ICM relevant MCQs

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care A to Z: An Encyclopaedia of Principles and Practice Steven M Yentis

– A good book to for quick access facts. Useful in MCQs

Textbook: General reference

Oxford Desk Reference: Critical Care Carl Waldmann

-Quite comprehensive for its size. Good to get a general overview of most ICM topics

Oh’s Intensive Care Manual, 6e Andrew Bersten

– Just have it and read it – start early.

Oxford Handbook of Critical Care (Oxford Medical Handbooks) Mervyn Singer

– A small textbook and a bit of a taster but by itself not comprehensive enough for exam preparation

Critical Care Secrets, 5e Polly E Parsons

– One of my favourite textbooks, purely because of how it is written in question/answer format.  A really nice textbook to practice for likely viva questions.

Online resources

http://pact.esicm.org/index.php?ipTested=1

– The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Patient-Centred Acute Care training resource is fantastic and available to all ESICM members.  It is also possible to get group / institutional access.  These training modules are very comprehensive and it takes quite a bit of time to go through each one.  They are regularly updated.  At the end of each module there is a number of MCQs relating to the topic.  There are good practice questions for the exam.

https://www.crit-iq.com/index.php/home

– This was one of my two main sources of knowledge while doing my Advanced (Step 2) ICM training and studying for the FFICM.  Although an Australian ICM site, it is jam packed with resources.  The website has recently added a specific FICM resource to the site.  The only downside is to have access to this fantastic resource you will need to become a member (or convince your institution to get institutional membership).

http://www.criticalcarereviews.com

– Excellent resource for keeping up to date with the latest research.

http://www.intensivecarenetwork.com

– Another Australian website, but excellent clinical resources for the Australian intensive care medicine exam. Also has some interesting podcasts

http://www.wellingtonicu.com/Education/Resources/

– For balance, a Kiwi site. Also full of exam resources from their side of the globe.

http://ccforum.com

– with Jean-Louis Vincent, Erasme University Hospital as the author this is a must read reference to stay in touch with the latest trends and reviews.

Blogs

http://lifeinthefastlane.com

– Essential online medical resources and reviews. Useful links for medical education, clinical medicine and health related online search.

http://www.sccmblogs.org

– Useful snippets of the latest research and controversies in critical care.

Apps

These are some of the apps on my smart phone that I used (a lot) for quick revision and to debate things with colleagues (young and old) on ward rounds.

ICU Trials

– An excellent app with summaries of all the landmark studies. Great for debating decisions on ward rounds.

ICU Pearls

ICU Notes

Critical Care

FOAMEd and twitter

 FOAMEd = Free Open Access Medical Education

This is the future of medical educations. There is no stopping this flood of information, discussion and knowledge sharing. It is international, real time and educational. Inspired by clinicians across the world and free.

By following #FOAMed on twitter you have access to a fountain of information for all things critical care.

If you are not on twitter yet, don’t get left behind in this knowledge revolution!

Well, that’s it for this blog. Hopefully (if I get asked back) the next blog will be based around a case and an educational topic.

Till then…

MJ IS AN ICU&ANAESTHETIC REGISTRAR AND PREHOSPITAL CARE DOCTOR IN OXFORD WHO (AMONGST MANY ACHIEVEMENTS) RECENTLY STARRED IN THE BBC2 MEDICAL SCIENCE DOCUMENTARY “An Hour to Save Your Life “